COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics)<\/a>\u00a0standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\nMyRes<\/strong>\u00a0is committed to follow the best publication practices on ethical matters, errors and retractions. Any kind of unethical behaviours are not tolerated and the conference has a zero tolerance to plagiarism. MyRes uses the iThenticate software, which checks submissions against millions of published research papers, documents on the web and other relevant sources. Furthermore, authors who submit papers to this conference must ensure and confirm that the article is original.<\/p>\n\n\n\nDuties of Editor<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nPublication Decisions:<\/strong>\u00a0Based on the review report, the editor has complete responsibility and authority to accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript.<\/p>\n\n\n\nReview of Manuscripts:<\/strong>\u00a0Each submission that is submitted is initially evaluated by the editor for originality by making use of online services. Following a preliminary desk review, the manuscript is forwarded to three different reviewers who will make a recommendation to accept, accept with minor corrections, accept with major corrections, re-submit for review or to reject the manuscript. In order to allow reviewers to determine potential cases of conflict-of-interest, a single-blind review approach is used. Thus, authors do not know who has reviewed their articles but reviewers know whose paper they are reviewing. As soon as two positive reviews are obtained, the manuscript is usually accepted for publication in the conference proceedings. If one positive review and one negative review is obtained, the editor waits until the views from a third reviewer are obtained. If both reviews are negative, the manuscript is usually rejected or the author(s) is\/are asked to re-submit the paper after making substantial improvements.<\/p>\n\n\n\nFair Review:<\/strong>\u00a0The editor ensures that each manuscript submitted to the conference is reviewed for its intellectual content without regard to nationality, race, religion, gender, etc. of the authors.<\/p>\n\n\n\nConfidentiality:<\/strong>\u00a0The editor ensures that information regarding manuscripts submitted by the authors is kept confidential.<\/p>\n\n\n\nDisclosure and Conflicts of Interest:<\/strong>\u00a0The editors or reviewers of this conference shall not use unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript for their own research without written consent of the author.<\/p>\n\n\n\nErrata Information:<\/strong>\u00a0The editor must publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.<\/p>\n\n\n\nEthical Guidelines:<\/strong>\u00a0The editor shall ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.<\/p>\n\n\n\nProof of Misconduct:<\/strong>\u00a0The editor should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.<\/p>\n\n\n\nDuties of Authors<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nPublication guidelines:<\/strong>\u00a0Authors must follow the submission guidelines of the conference.<\/p>\n\n\n\nOriginal Work:<\/strong>\u00a0Authors must ensure that what they have written is original. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\nMultiple Submissions:\u00a0<\/strong>Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\nAuthorship of the Paper:<\/strong>\u00a0All authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.<\/p>\n\n\n\nData Access and Retention:<\/strong>\u00a0Authors should provide raw data related to their manuscript for editorial review and must retain such data.<\/p>\n\n\n\nAuthenticity of Data:<\/strong>\u00a0Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.<\/p>\n\n\n\nConflict of Interest:<\/strong>\u00a0Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.<\/p>\n\n\n\nFundamental Errors:<\/strong>\u00a0Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes at any point of time if the author(s) discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in submitted manuscript.<\/p>\n\n\n\nSubmission Check Form:<\/strong>\u00a0All authors must complete the author submission check list form.<\/p>\n\n\n\nResearch on Human Subjects:<\/strong>\u00a0When appropriate, all authors must cite approval by an institutional review board (IRB) for research on human subjects.<\/p>\n\n\n\nDuties of Reviewers<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nConfidentiality:<\/strong>\u00a0Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.<\/p>\n\n\n\nAcknowledgement of Sources:<\/strong>\u00a0Reviewers must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research.<\/p>\n\n\n\nStandards of Objectivity:<\/strong>\u00a0Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.<\/p>\n\n\n\nSupporting Argument:<\/strong>\u00a0Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments<\/p>\n\n\n\nPlagiarism, Fraud and Other Ethical Concerns:<\/strong>\u00a0Reviewers should let the editor know if you suspect\/find that a manuscript is a substantial copy of another work, citing the previous work in as much detail as possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\nRelevant Work:<\/strong>\u00a0Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.<\/p>\n\n\n\nConflicts of Interest:<\/strong>\u00a0Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.<\/p>\n\n\n\nPromptness:<\/strong>\u00a0In the event that a reviewer feels it is not possible for him\/her to complete the review of the manuscript within the stipulated time then this information must be communicated to the editor, so that the manuscript could be sent to another reviewer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Ethics and Malpractice Statement The\u00a0International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research\u00a0(MyRes) publication ethics and malpractice statement are based almost wholly on the\u00a0COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics)\u00a0standards. MyRes\u00a0is committed to follow the best publication practices on ethical matters, errors and retractions. Any kind of unethical behaviours are not tolerated and the conference has a zero tolerance to plagiarism….<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-7951","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/myres.net\/2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/myres.net\/2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/myres.net\/2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/myres.net\/2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/myres.net\/2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7951"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/myres.net\/2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7951\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7952,"href":"https:\/\/myres.net\/2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7951\/revisions\/7952"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/myres.net\/2026\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}